In CHIP lab, we value sharing our work with others both inside and outside of the academy. To do so, we occasionally write general-audience pieces that translate psychological science for the non-academic public. We also engage with journalists and other public scholars who apply our science to current events and who share it with wider audiences.
Cheek, N. N. (2024). Many of us have the wrong idea about poverty and toughness. Psyche.
Cheek, N. N. (2023). Harassment and abuse perceived to harm poor women less – new research finds a ‘thicker skin’ bias. The Conversation.
Cheek, N. N., Bandt-Law, B., & Sinclair, S. (2023). Women in poverty experience more gender-based violence, but get less help. SPSP Character & Context Blog.
Cheek, N. N., Reutskaja, E., Schwartz, B., & Iyengar, S. (2022). Is having too many choices (versus too few) really the greatest problem for consumers? Behavioral Scientist.
Reutskaja, E., Cheek, N. N., Iyengar, S., & Schwartz, B. (2022). Do global consumers have too many choices or not enough? Forbes.
Bandt-Law, B., Cheek, N. N., Goh, J. X., Kaiser, C. R., & Sinclair, S. (2021). Why we neglect some sexual harassment victims more than others. SPSP Character & Context Blog.
Research suggests belief that people in poverty have 'thick skin.' Created Equal, Detroit Public Radio.
Freedom versus security: Can we find the right balance? Under the Cortex Podcast.
Why some sexual harassment claims are considered more credible than others. Forbes.
Is denim an identity crisis? The New York Times.
Princeton researchers just exposed the most pervasive and harmful myth about poverty. Fast Company.
The hidden danger (and promise) in Biden’s new climate justice screening tool. The Hill.